answers ^#blog


Be Crazy vs. Get Crazy

Be Crazy vs. Get Crazy

Living these days is quite challenging for humans. We can all get crazy and mad with building the future. Wars are going on for respective suggestions and imaginations by scientists, journalists, politicians, and investors. When are we building the moon base? When will the next coronavirus spread? And will classic media ever be profitable again?

And everything has to gain some profit by default. In a way in which every human is satisfied. From the internet we can learn where humans are investing. We can learn which developments occur in bioscience, for example. We can spot every new drug if we like to. Likewise, we can ask AI how useful this is for a treatment.

So let’s report on our measures

For keeping an eye on all these things, we have to find ways to aggregate information in a way we are capable of not getting crazy. This is why I recommend aggregating your sources. Take a look at my solution, which I established for my daily read in 2013.

This is where I recognized that I don’t go crazy about all this stuff, but perhaps I am a bit crazy with all this stuff. Not with the wars, not with the dangers and threats, but, for example, with the designs humans build. With the contests we prove our skills with. And with the colors we use.

So profiting from keeping our eyes on all of this might not fulfill your career targets. But in a way you are trying not to get crazy about your career. It’s like the toolset we can utilize for aggregating the internet, just a simplepie. And getting your piece of the pie, which hopefully matches your taste, is effortless.

This might not be a scientific approach. It’s not like calculating profit. It is my attempt at trying to become antifragile in times when goals like achieving robustness have the potential of making you mad.

Nature can hold secrets

When you think about nature and how your environment changes because of our impact, with calculated sourcing it becomes like a natural problem-solving system, embedded into the time lapse we experience during 5786, 1447, 2026, 2569 or 2083 years.

🎙️ choosing

Buridan’s ass

  • Should two courses be judged equal, then the will cannot break the deadlock, all it can do is to suspend judgement until the circumstances change, and the right course of action is clear. (Jean Buridan)

Science is not democracy, and democracy is not science.

This is a solution for:

Us/We

Featured image comes from pexels.

Living these days is quite challenging for humans. We can all get crazy and mad with building the future. Wars are going on for respective suggestions and imaginations by scientists, journalists, politicians, and investors. When are we building the moon base? When will the next coronavirus spread? And will classic media ever be profitable again?

And everything has to gain some profit by default. In a way in which every human is satisfied. From the internet we can learn where humans are investing. We can learn which developments occur in bioscience, for example. We can spot every new drug if we like to. Likewise, we can ask AI how useful this is for a treatment.

So let’s report on our measures

For keeping an eye on all these things, we have to find ways to aggregate information in a way we are capable of not getting crazy. This is why I recommend aggregating your sources. Take a look at my solution, which I established for my daily read in 2013.

This is where I recognized that I don’t go crazy about all this stuff, but perhaps I am a bit crazy with all this stuff. Not with the wars, not with the dangers and threats, but, for example, with the designs humans build. With the contests we prove our skills with. And with the colors we use.

So profiting from keeping our eyes on all of this might not fulfill your career targets. But in a way you are trying not to get crazy about your career. It’s like the toolset we can utilize for aggregating the internet, just a simplepie. And getting your piece of the pie, which hopefully matches your taste, is effortless.

This might not be a scientific approach. It’s not like calculating profit. It is my attempt at trying to become antifragile in times when goals like achieving robustness have the potential of making you mad.

Nature can hold secrets

When you think about nature and how your environment changes because of our impact, with calculated sourcing it becomes like a natural problem-solving system, embedded into the time lapse we experience during 5786, 1447, 2026, 2569 or 2083 years.

🎙️ choosing

Buridan’s ass

  • Should two courses be judged equal, then the will cannot break the deadlock, all it can do is to suspend judgement until the circumstances change, and the right course of action is clear. (Jean Buridan)

Science is not democracy, and democracy is not science.

This is a solution for:

Us/We

Featured image comes from pexels.

furthermore

Be Crazy vs. Get Crazy

Screen orientation reloaded

Like the Clintons’ did

Every Language Has an Image

Release note

Browsers render different

With love

Merry Christmas everybody

Adding a gradient as background in WordPress

Light and dark vs. black and white

Marking clicked links as visited

A Fresh Start Into 2026: Small Utilities With a Big Impact

The End of the EU’s ODR Platform: What Online Businesses Should Know

Losing focus

Just like a rolling stone

Aspect ratio Media Query

Obsolescence childish

Make footer lines static in WordPress

answers

^#blog


3close Agency UG Logo

by commenting this article, you agree to the privacy policy & the storage of the personal data you provide.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *